First task: confirm cohabitation
This is the central issue in establishing common-law status.
Helpful documents that show:
- the same address;
- residence of both partners in this place;
- a period that covers at least 12 consecutive months.
A common-law partner is a partner with whom you live as a couple without being married to each other. For immigration to Canada, the immigration department (IRCC) considers the duration and continuity of your cohabitation.
In simple terms, for an immigration application, common-law usually means that you have lived together as a couple for at least 12 consecutive months.
It is important to confirm not only that the relationship exists. The documents should help to show that you actually lived together for the required period.
There is no one universal document for this.
For the status of partners without a registered marriage - common-law partners - in Canadian immigration rules, it is not 12 months of relationship that are important, but at least 12 consecutive months of living together as a couple.
Short temporary trips for work, business or family reasons may be acceptable. Long periods of separation require separate assessment.
Select documents that link both partners to a common address and show the entire declared period. The exact composition of the evidence depends on the program.
A strong package shows not just one document, but the history of life together.
IRCC needs to see three things.
You can understand when cohabitation began and that the required period has actually been reached.
The documents bind both partners to the same home and show their real life together.
Dates, addresses and marital status do not contradict the application form and other documents.
There is no rule that you need a joint bank account, joint tenancy, or a certain number of photos.
You need to look at the official list of documents specifically for your submission.
Common-law evidence serves two different purposes.
This is the central issue in establishing common-law status.
Helpful documents that show:
In some types of filings, especially family sponsorships, IRCC separately evaluates whether the relationship is genuine and not created just for the sake of immigration.
Then the following may additionally matter:
These are related but not the same questions.
Photos can help confirm a relationship, but do not themselves usually show 12 months of cohabitation.
Start with documents that link both partners to the same address.
IRCC gives, among others, the following examples:
For example:
Depending on the feed, the following can be used:
IRCC explicitly states that it is not necessary to have every possible type of evidence. Other documents may also be considered.
Documents should help to see life together over time.
If all the evidence relates to just one month, it does a poor job of explaining what happened in the remaining months.
It is more useful to assemble the documents so that they show different parts of the 12-month period:
However, IRCC does not establish a universal “one document for every month” rule.
There is no need to artificially create the same number of documents for each month. The goal is to show a clear, consistent story.
Check what is covered in different parts of your story.
The matrix does not determine whether you are common-law and does not estimate the likelihood of an IRCC decision.
It helps to notice a practical question:
Do you have evidence from different sources and for different parts of the 12 month period?
| Category | What helps confirm | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | Cohabitation | rent, property, lessor documents |
| One address | Both partners are associated with the same place of residence | IDs, insurance, bank or other documents with address |
| Shared finances | General financial responsibilities | joint account, loan, common expenses |
| Insurance and benefits | The partner is indicated in official insurance or work documents | life insurance, benefits from the employer, indicating the partner as the recipient of the payment |
| Everyday life together | Additional relationship context | correspondence, trips, photographs, letters from relatives or friends |
How to Read Marks: Missing a mark in a category does not mean the package is insufficient. This is just a map of what has already been collected.
Mark the periods for which you have supporting evidence. An empty cell does not mean the evidence is insufficient. Your selections are not saved or sent anywhere.
This does not automatically mean that common-law cannot be proven.
This happens often.
For example, one partner moved in later, the landlord did not add him to the contract, or the housing belongs to relatives.
In this case, it is important to look for other independent documents that link the second partner to the same address and period.
These could be, if they really exist:
There is no need to create a document after the fact or ask someone to confirm something that did not happen.
If there is little standard evidence, sometimes it makes sense to attach an explanation, but an explanation does not automatically become a replacement for a mandatory document.
Look not at one invoice, but at the entire set of documents.
In some countries or households, utilities can technically only be registered to one person.
Then it is useful to show:
If there is a reasonable reason why there are no joint accounts, it can be briefly explained.
The absence of an ordinary lease changes the evidence, but does not create the right to invent documents.
If the couple lived:
you need to look for real documents that existed during this period.
For example:
A letter from a relative or homeowner may be useful additional evidence, but is best considered in conjunction with independent documentation.
Short temporary absences are possible, but context is important.
IRCC specifies that during the qualifying 12 months, the cohabitation must be uninterrupted, with no long periods of separation.
A short temporary absence may be due, for example, to:
But it is impossible to establish a universal number of days that is always considered acceptable.
If during the first 12 months there were long trips, different countries of residence, or periods when each had a separate home, such a period must be dealt with carefully.
Do not automatically apply Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) rules to the immigration definition of common-law status. For an immigration application, use IRCC’s specific requirements.
This is a different issue than shaping the first 12 months.
First, common-law status must actually arise through the required period of cohabitation.
After this, life circumstances may change: work in another city, travel, temporary residence in another country.
But the duration and reason for separation may be important in assessing the current relationship.
If the situation is not obvious, you should not try to solve it with one rule from the Internet.
This is a declaration of common-law union, not a substitute for evidence.
IRCC uses the form Statutory Declaration of Common-Law Union, IMM 5409.
In Russian, this can be understood as an official declaration of common-law relations.
The form asks, among other things, about:
The requirement to download IMM 5409 depends on the filing type and the current document list.
For example, the current Express Entry instructions include IMM 5409 for an applicant who has declared their marital status as common-law.
But the form itself does not replace the need to attach supporting documents if your submission requires them.
Always use the most current version of the IRCC form and instructions.
You cannot transfer the requirements of one list of documents to another program.
Common-law status can be important in different types of applications:
But the list of confirmations may vary. The official list of documents for your submission (list of documents) takes precedence.
For example, some current permanent residency programs specifically require IMM 5409 and proof of 12 consecutive months of cohabitation.
Family sponsorship uses its own list of documents with more detailed categories of evidence of the relationship.
Therefore the rule:
First determine the filing type, then open its current list of documents.
Family sponsorship has its own evidentiary logic.
In the current list of documents for sponsorship, IRCC may ask a spouse or partner to select a certain number of sets of evidence from listed categories, for example:
If the required categories are unavailable, this document checklist provides for an explanation and other evidence of cohabitation.
But these quantitative requirements apply to specific list of documents for family sponsorship.
They may not automatically transfer to Express Entry, AIP, PNP or another program.
These facts can confirm the relationship, but do not replace 12 months of cohabitation.
A birth certificate with the names of both parents can be important proof of the relationship.
However, for common-law status under immigration rules, you cannot assume that having a child together means the status has already been established.
They may indicate the seriousness of the relationship, but do not in themselves confirm 12 consecutive months of cohabitation.
Photos are useful as additional context, especially for family sponsorships.
But they usually show less clearly the fact of permanent residence at one address.
Cohabitation is the central issue in establishing common-law status.
A joint bank account can be good evidence of a shared financial life.
But a couple can have a joint account and not live together.
Conversely, partners may live together, but not have a common banking product.
Therefore, do not evaluate the entire package based on one “strong” document.
Look at the totality of the evidence and what exactly each document supports.
Documents and forms should tell the same story.
Check:
If one document shows an old address, this is not necessarily an error. It may have been issued before the move.
But the discrepancies must be explained by the facts.
Don't change dates on documents or applications just to make them look the same.
Explanation is useful when documents without context create a question.
For example:
In such a case, a letter of explanation (LOE) can help connect the facts and documents.
But LOE does not correct misrepresentations or guarantee that IRCC will accept an insufficient package.
Your selections remain only on this page and are not sent anywhere.
A separate check is especially useful if:
Initial Consultation: Zoom · 50 minutes · CAD 160 + taxes.
Not necessarily. A joint tenancy may be strong evidence of a common address, but IRCC looks at the entire package and period. Check the official list of documents for your submission.
Let's look at dates of cohabitation, addresses, temporary travel, available evidence, IMM 5409 and the requirements of your specific program.
If you retain us for full representation within 14 calendar days after the consultation, the consultation fee is credited toward the cost of further services.
The materials on the site are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute individual immigration advice.