Сервис · Express Entry quality control
Review превращает выбранную версию Express Entry profile или post-ITA e-APR в проверяемую карту: какой факт заявлен, какое program/CRS rule он затрагивает, чем подтверждается и где есть contradiction, missing evidence или update duty. Это не подача от имени клиента, не ITA/PR guarantee и не обещание срока IRCC. Сначала письменно фиксируются stage, scope, cutoff version, reviewer authority и deliverable. Публичная форма не принимает application file или чувствительные документы; checkout отключён до commercial configuration и подтверждённого qualified reviewer.
Что именно проверяется
Выберите свою ситуацию
Stage controls rule date, evidence burden and useful deliverable. One review cannot honestly cover an unknown future version.
Eligibility + ranking inputs
Проверяются CEC/FSWP/FSTP eligibility assumptions, NOC/TEER duties, work periods, language/ECA, family, Canadian factors, PNP and current CRS inputs. Output separates verified, applicant-stated, pending and dynamic. It does not predict draw, category, cut-off or invitation. Profile expiration and updates remain applicant/account operations unless representation is separately appointed.
Recheck at invitation/submission
Проверяются invited program, round score, changes since profile, personalized forms/checklist, identity/family, education/language, work, funds, police/medical and histories. Claim-to-evidence map and contradiction regression are central. Review does not extend ITA deadline, obtain issuer records or make an incomplete application complete by explanation.
Defined document scope
Подходит, если route/forms уже fixed, а вопрос ограничен work reference, funds, translation, ECA, common-law, police certificate, military record or explanation. Scope states exact files/people/period and controlling instruction. Result is not a whole-application approval and cannot be reused after material version change without recheck.
Post-submit issue
После submission review begins from transmitted record, confirmation, current account message and question: ADR, material update, technical issue or refusal risk. It does not rewrite filed answers silently. Correction uses current official channel; urgent refusal, procedural fairness, inadmissibility or judicial deadline is escalated to qualified case-specific advice.
До оплаты
Результат, границы и исключения видны до начала работы.
Входит
Не входит
Ваш письменный пакет
Конечный набор результатов, который можно проверить и использовать после работы.
Шаг за шагом
Двигайтесь по порядку и проверяйте определяющую инструкцию на каждом этапе.
Before files or payment, record stage, decision question, family members, deadline, expected deliverable and whether task is quality control, paid immigration advice, form completion or representation. Confirm reviewer identity/competence and written terms. If question is urgent refusal, inadmissibility, procedural fairness or court deadline, ordinary review pauses and routes to qualified triage.
Public form receives only contact and broad stage; do not upload passport, UCI, bank/police/medical records, complete application, GCMS or credentials. After scope, open protected workspace and request minimum files. Create version manifest before reading. Redact irrelevant identifiers where permissible, set access/retention and never ask for account password or 2FA.
Save current official eligibility, CRS, profile/e-APR and document instructions plus personalized checklist/request. Record timestamps and dynamic triggers. Freeze the exact reviewed profile/forms/PDFs. If applicant edits during review, changes enter a new delta list; reviewer does not compare a moving target or sign off on unseen last-minute upload.
Extract facts without rewriting them: age/date, family, citizenship/residence/status, language, education/ECA, work duties/periods, NOC/TEER, funds, nomination and Canadian factors. Link each to program/CRS rule and source evidence. Recalculate at relevant events. Unknown remains unknown; convenient title, memory or intended future document does not become confirmed fact.
Compare profile to e-APR and documents, then Personal/Address/Work/Travel histories and prior applications. Check gaps, overlaps, names/transliteration, dates, family/status changes, hours/duties, settlement funds, language/ECA expiry and request-specific evidence. Classification distinguishes correction, explanation, missing issuer record, changed eligibility and potential serious truthfulness concern.
Discuss issues by severity, not page order. Applicant supplies corrections/issuer records through secure channel; reviewer verifies only agreed cycle. Final note lists closed and unresolved items, exact version and next action. Applicant controls truth and final declarations. If IRCC submission/change is outside mandate, review ends before account action and points to current official instructions.
Сравните по одинаковым критериям
The same fact can affect eligibility, CRS, completeness and disclosure differently at profile, ITA, e-APR and post-submit events.
| Критерий | Что проверяется | Результат | Граница вывода |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-profile eligibility | Current facts against CEC/FSWP/FSTP gates, language/ECA/work requirements, family/funds/status and program-specific dates. | Eligibility hypothesis map with confirmed/pending/failed conditions and source-linked next evidence. | Pool acceptance and future system result are not guaranteed; province/category/draw outcomes remain external. |
| CRS/profile | Current CRS factors and entered profile answers, including spouse, Canadian factors, language, education, work and nomination. | Reproducible input table, current calculation, discrepancies and update triggers. | Does not predict future cut-off or ITA. System score can change with rules/date and does not prove evidence sufficiency. |
| Post-ITA threshold | Invited program/round, score at invitation, changes before submission and current eligible status. | Event comparison and material-change flags before deciding accept/decline/submit. | Explanation cannot restore lost eligibility or CRS below controlling threshold; case-specific review may be required. |
| e-APR forms/history | Personal, Address, Work, Travel and family/application histories, prior records and profile delta. | Gap/overlap and contradiction log with exact fields and truthful correction path. | No rewriting history for neatness and no assurance that disclosure eliminates admissibility/misrepresentation risk. |
| Evidence package | Personalized checklist and named identity, civil, education, language, work, funds, police, medical, relationship and translation files. | Claim-to-evidence index, missing/format/readability/translation and alternative-evidence issues. | Reviewer cannot make issuer record genuine or guarantee officer accepts alternative/missing document explanation. |
| Post-submit change/ADR | Transmitted record, request letter, new fact/effective date, evidence and current official channel/deadline. | Response/change matrix and transmission checklist within separate scope. | Review does not extend deadline, accelerate IRCC or prove a selected/uploaded file was transmitted. |
Проверка доказательств
Рассматривайте каждый пункт как факт для проверки, а не как формальную отметку без подтверждающих документов.
Прозрачные коммерческие условия
После письменного подтверждения scopeCAD
Price and timing depend on stage, applicants, forms/document categories, history depth, urgency and correction cycle. Online purchase is disabled until owner confirms qualified reviewer, capacity, secure intake, service agreement and Stripe product. No card charge, promised delivery date or reviewer appointment is created by this page.
Сначала доступность и scope
Онлайн-оплата пока недоступна. Публичные границы услуги остаются видимыми, а запрос доступности можно отправить без материалов дела.
След доказательств
Откройте определяющий источник и проверьте правило в исходном контексте.
Вопросы и различия
Короткие ответы о деталях, которые чаще всего меняют следующий шаг.
Нет. Review can check current published eligibility and reproduce CRS inputs from confirmed facts, but pool/system validation, category/round selection and cut-off are external and dynamic. Future ITA cannot be promised. Output states assumptions, evidence gaps and recheck triggers. If a fact changes, result must be recalculated; old memo is not permanent eligibility certificate.
Да. Scope covers current program eligibility assumptions, CRS inputs, NOC/work, language/ECA, family, funds/status and answer consistency. No supporting documents are uploaded to IRCC at profile stage, but future claims must be supportable. The deliverable is profile issue log and evidence plan, not e-APR approval. After ITA a new stage review is required because personalized forms/checklist and event thresholds apply.
Review must identify invited program/round, recalculate eligibility and score after changes, compare profile with e-APR, personalized checklist and all histories/evidence. ITA normally has 60-day application window per current EE page, but account message controls. Missing required evidence, score drop or changed family/status cannot be solved by generic LOE. Material issues are escalated before submission.
Not under this review scope. Form completion, account operation, declarations, upload, payment, submission and IRCC communication are separate services and may constitute advice/representation requiring authorized person and written mandate. Applicant remains responsible for truth. Never share password/2FA. Final review marks a file version; it does not sign or transmit it.
Only named categories in written scope: for example language/ECA, work references, funds, police/civil/common-law, translations, histories or LOE. Personalized checklist remains controlling. Complete package is not assumed from a folder link. Scope manifest lists every file/version reviewed and excluded; new or replaced files require delta/recheck before anyone calls them reviewed.
Review can compare real duties and periods with current NOC structure and program rule. Job title alone does not determine code. Employer letter cannot be rewritten to imitate NOC, and missing evidence is not solved by convenient code. Result records plausible mapping, discrepancies and evidence action; it does not compel IRCC classification or create qualifying experience.
Review identifies wrong answer, correct fact, effective date, evidence and impact across profile/e-APR/histories. Truthful correction should use current applicable channel. Explanation does not restore lost CRS/eligibility or erase material false information. Serious misrepresentation/admissibility concern needs authorized case-specific legal review; ordinary QA must not minimize it as typo.
Public form receives no case file. After scope, protected workspace uses minimum access, version manifest, retention/deletion and no credentials. Irrelevant identifiers are redacted where permissible. Full application, bank/police/medical records and ATIP notes are not sent in ordinary email/chat. Deliverable references secure filenames/pages and a separate summary can be shared without copying unnecessary personal data.
No public fixed price/timeline is invented. Volume depends on stage, applicants, forms, documents, histories, urgency and correction cycle. Written scope identifies price, deliverable, assumptions and target only after capacity and qualified reviewer are confirmed. Checkout is disabled, so this page cannot charge or reserve a deadline. IRCC processing time is entirely outside service.
Route immediately if issue involves possible misrepresentation, criminal/medical/security inadmissibility, removal/status emergency, procedural fairness, refusal remedy, mandamus or judicial review deadline, or non-immigration legal/tax/family question. Also route translation, notarization/apostille, ECA, medical/police and issuer acts to competent providers. Application review should expose boundaries, not imitate every profession.
